I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
18.3.2024
(Case T-753/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trademark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Gartenlux - Previous company name and business name GARTENLUX - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2024/2032)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Andrea Nieß (Kempen, Germany) (represented by: A. Erlenhardt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Thema Products BV (Venlo, Netherlands)
By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 September 2022 (Case R 608/2022-2).
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 24, 23.1.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2032/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)