- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-239/15: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2017 — Cryo-Save v EUIPO — MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack (Cryo-Save) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark Cryo-Save — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the mark — Burden of proof — Declaration of revocation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0239
62015TA0239
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.5.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 144/36
(Case T-239/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Cryo-Save - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the mark - Burden of proof - Declaration of revocation))
(2017/C 144/47)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Cryo-Save AG (Freienbach, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko and W. Schramek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG (Billerbeck, Germany) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2015 (Case R 2567/2013-4), concerning revocation proceedings between MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack and Cryo-Save.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Cryo-Save AG to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017144EN.01003601-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017144EN.01003601-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.