EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-25/25: Action brought on 17 January 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0025

62025CN0025

January 17, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/1413

10.3.2025

(Case C-25/25)

(C/2025/1413)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: Ts. Georgieva, M. Mataija und G. Meessen, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should:

1.declare that, by preserving in national legislation a provision that determines in an abstract manner the maximum duration of temporary cross-border provision of social services the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC. (*)

2.order the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The matter concerns an application made on the basis of Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The Commission submits that the Republic of Bulgaria failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EU and Articles 56 and 57 TFEU concerning the cross-border provision of social services by providers established in another Member State or in the European Economic Area. The Republic of Bulgaria adopted provisions in national legislation determining the maximum duration of temporary cross-border provision of social services which are contrary to EU law.

The application is based on the following two pleas in law.

First, according to the Commission, the Zakon za sotsialnite uslugi (Law on Social Services) restricts the temporary provision of social services by providers who are not established in the Republic of Bulgaria to six months in a calendar year. That requirement limits the freedom to provide services pursuant to Article 16 of Directive 2006/123/EC. Suppliers who wish to provide social services for a period longer than six months in a calendar year must be established in the territory of the Republic of Bulgaria, which requires that a licence be obtained pursuant to Bulgarian legislation, That requirement is prohibited by Article 16(2)(a) or, alternatively, Article 16(2)(b) of Directive 2006/12/EC.

Second, supposing that Directive 2006/123 does not apply to the contested provisions of the Law on Social Services or to certain specific activities, the Commission submits that the Bulgarian legislation applicable to the cross-border provision of social services infringes Articles 56 and 57 TFEU.

* Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ L376, 2006 p. 36)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1413/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia