EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-694/22: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – CMT v EUIPO – Camomilla (CAMOMILLA italia) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CAMOMILLA italia – Earlier EU word mark CAMOMILLA – Relative ground for refusal – Comparison of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Power of the Court to alter decisions)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0694

62022TA0694

September 4, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/6088

21.10.2024

(Case T-694/22)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark CAMOMILLA italia - Earlier EU word mark CAMOMILLA - Relative ground for refusal - Comparison of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Power of the Court to alter decisions)

(C/2024/6088)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: CMT Compagnia manifatture tessili Srl (CMT Srl) (Naples, Italy) (represented by: P. Marzano, G. Rubino and F. Cordova, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. L. Capostagno and R. Raponi, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Camomilla Srl (Assago, Italy) (represented by: M. Mussi and H. Chiappetta, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 August 2022 (Case R 1738/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 August 2022 (Case R 1738/2021-2) in so far as it finds that there is a likelihood of confusion regarding ‘Clothing (excluding bathrobes)’ in Class 25 and alters that decision in such a way as to reject the application for a declaration of invalidity of the mark registered under number 9 287 038 in respect of those goods;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders each party to bear its own costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

(1) OJ C 7, 9.1.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6088/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia