- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-765/17: Action brought on 23 November 2017 — Kiku v CPVO — Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Pinova)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0765
62017TN0765
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.1.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 22/56
(Case T-765/17)
(2018/C 022/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Kiku GmbH (Girlan, Italy) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (Dresden, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before the CPVO
Proprietor of the contested plant varieties: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Plant variety at issue: Plant variety right for the apple variety ‘PINOVA’ — Certificate No EU 1298
Procedure before the CPVO: Nullity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 16 August 2017 in Case A005/2016
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the CPVO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 20(1)(a), in conjunction with Articles 10 and 116(1), of Regulation No 2100/94.