- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-797/24, Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Správny súd v Bratislave (Slovakia) lodged on 18 November 2024 – A.B.C.D. v Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0797
62024CN0797
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/1078
(Case C-797/24, Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky)
(C/2025/1078)
Language of the case: Slovak
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: A.B.C.D.
Defendant: Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky
Questions referred
1.Should Article 20(1) and (3) of Directive (EU) 2019/1937 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law, read in the context of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as meaning that the measures of support to which Member States must ensure access, as appropriate, for the persons referred to in Article 4 of the Directive also encompass the right of the competent authority within the meaning of the Directive to be admitted to any judicial proceedings whatsoever regardless of their nature, provided that a person referred to in Article 4 of the Directive is a participant in those proceedings?
2.Should Article 20(1) and (3) of Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law, read in the context of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as meaning that it is for the national court conducting the proceedings in which the person referred to in Article 4 of the Directive is a participant to assess whether the phrase ‘as appropriate’ applies when a person referred to in Article 4 of the Directive is to have access to support measures or when the competent authority within the meaning of the Directive is to have the right to grant support measures to the persons referred to in Article 4 of the Directive?
3.Should Article 21(1) of Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law, read in the context of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as meaning that the necessary measures to ensure that the persons referred to in Article 4 are protected against retaliation, which are to be taken by Member States, encompass an obligation for the Member State to ensure that the competent authority within the meaning of the Directive has the opportunity to be admitted to any judicial proceedings whatsoever, regardless of their nature, provided that the person referred to in Article 4 of the Directive is a participant in those judicial proceedings?
(1) OJ 2019 L 305, p. 17.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1078/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—