EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-870/24, Outletico: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 17 December 2024 – Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v SIA OUTLETICO

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0870

62024CN0870

December 17, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/1409

10.3.2025

(Case C-870/24, Outletico)

(C/2025/1409)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant and defendant at first instance: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Respondent and claimant at first instance: SIA OUTLETICO

Questions referred

1.Must Article 1 and Article 3(3) of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (1) be interpreted as meaning that a natural person who holds shares in an undertaking must also be regarded as an enterprise? Is the answer to the preceding question affected where the national legislation provides that the taking of certain decisions connected with the management of the undertaking is the competence of the general meeting (the shareholders’ meeting)? Does the foregoing, in itself, constitute a sufficient basis for finding that a natural person who holds shares in an undertaking (the majority of the shareholder voting rights) directly or indirectly influences the management of the undertaking and, therefore, engages in an economic activity or is involved in the economic activity of that undertaking, without there being any need to assess whether the natural person actually takes part in the management of the undertaking?

2.Must [Article 3(3)], fourth subparagraph, of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty be interpreted as meaning that the expression ‘enterprises which have one or other of such relationships through a natural person’, within the meaning of that provision, also includes a situation in which a natural person is a shareholder and holds the majority of the voting rights in an undertaking which, in turn, holds the majority of the shareholder voting rights in another undertaking, where that second undertaking is considered to be a linked enterprise in respect of other undertakings and, in those latter undertakings, that same natural person is a shareholder and holds the majority of the shareholder voting rights?

(1) OJ 2014 L 187, p. 1.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1409/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia