I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2018/C 166/47)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: UE (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision adopted by the Commission on 20 November 2017 rejecting her complaint related to a request for compensation of the damage suffered by the applicant;
—grant the compensation of the moral prejudice suffered by the fault of the defendant, evaluated at the sum of 10 000 euros and;
—order the reimbursement of the applicant’s incurred costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging the violation by the defendant of the principle of sound administration and of Article 41 of the Charter on the principle of reasonable delay.
2.Second plea in law, alleging the respect by the applicant of the principle of reasonable delay in the submission of the request for assistance.