- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-634/24, Lenaimon: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 30 September 2024 – M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0634
62024CN0634
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/246
(Case C-634/24, Lenaimon)
(C/2025/246)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: M.P.
Defendant: Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos
Questions referred
1.Should Article 30.6 of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement be interpreted as precluding a person holding Canadian, Israeli and Russian citizenship from relying on the provisions of that agreement in an appeal to a national court regarding a permit to reside temporarily in the Republic of Lithuania in circumstances such as those of the present case?
2.Is Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 of the European Parliament and of the Council on 14 November 2018 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, read in conjunction with Annex II, to be interpreted as not precluding national legislation valid for a limited period, under which a Russian citizen seeking to apply for a permit to reside temporarily in the Republic of Lithuania is subject to a requirement to present a valid visa or residence permit, notwithstanding the fact that such a person has entered the Republic of Lithuania under a visa-free regime as a national of a State listed in Annex II to Regulation 2018/1806, while at the same time raising the question of the compatibility of those provisions of Regulation 2018/1806 with CETA in circumstances such as those of the present case?
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
OJ 2017 L 11, p. 23.
OJ 2018 L 303, p. 39.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/246/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—