- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-31/19: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — AF v FRA (Action for annulment and damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 — Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ — 2014 Staff Regulations — No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above — 2017 reclassification exercise — Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0031
62019TB0031
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.6.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/12
(Case T-31/19) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment and damages - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Duties as an administrator as a policy adviser in grade AD 12 - Assignment to the type of post ‘administrator’ - 2014 Staff Regulations - No eligibility for reclassification in the grade above - 2017 reclassification exercise - Refusal to consider the applicant for the purposes of his reclassification in grade AD 13 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2020/C 191/16)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: AF (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (represented by: M. O’Flaherty, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the FRA decision of 9 May 2018 not to include the applicant’s name in the list of temporary staff eligible for reclassification to grade AD 13 in the 2017 reclassification exercise and, secondly, compensation for the loss he has allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) shall bear its own costs and pay one quarter of the costs incurred by AF.
3.AF shall bear three quarters of his own costs.
Language of the case: English.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.