- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-686/17: Action brought on 4 October 2017 — Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros and Medicina Asturiana v SRB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0686
62017TN0686
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.12.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 424/50
(Case T-686/17)
(2017/C 424/74)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicants: Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros, SA (Oviedo, Spain) and Medicina Asturiana, SA (Oviedo) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the General Court should:
—Declare that the Single Resolution Board has incurred non-contractual liability and order it to repair the harm suffered by the applicants as a result of both its actions and its omissions which deprived them of the BANCO POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. bonds and securities they owned;
—Order the Board to pay to the applicants EUR 1 850 000 and the bonds’ unpaid interest accrued up to the date of repayment as compensation for the harm suffered (‘the amount due’);
—Increase the amount due with compensatory interest as of 7 June 2017 until delivery of the judgment disposing of the present case;
—Increase the amount due with corresponding default interest as of the date of delivery of judgment until its payment in full, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points.
—Order the SRB to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-659/17 Vallina Fonseca v SRB.