EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-437/23: Action brought on 28 July 2023 — Almaghout v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0437

62023TN0437

July 28, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

11.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/66

(Case T-437/23)

(2023/C 321/74)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hala Almaghout (represented by: M. Lester and M. Birdling, Barristers and G. Symeonidis, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the Decision (CFSP) 2023/1035 of 25 May 2023 (1), maintaining the listing of the Applicant under Annex I to Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP as amended and Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 as amended (the Contested Measures), insofar as they apply to the Applicant.

order that the Council pay her costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant contends that her inclusion in the Contested Measures is a result of manifest errors of assessment by the Council. In particular, she is no longer a member of the Makhlouf family, has no connection with the Syrian regime, has no influence over it and poses no risk of circumvention. Contrary to the reasons given for listing her on the EU’s Syria restrictive measures, there is no risk in her case that any inherited assets will be used to support the activities of the Syrian regime or will flow into the regime’s possession.

(1) Language of the case: English.

JO 2023, L 139, p. 49.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia