- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-88/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 June 2011 — Van Asbroek v European Commission (Civil service — Officials — Decision on classification in intermediate grade — Request for re-examination — Substantial new fact — None — Action manifestly inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010FB0088
62010FB0088
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.8.2011
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 232/42
(Case F-88/10) (*)
(Civil service - Officials - Decision on classification in intermediate grade - Request for re-examination - Substantial new fact - None - Action manifestly inadmissible)
(2011/C 232/76)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Van Asbroek (Dilbeek, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by G. Berscheid and D. Martin, Agents, and subsequently by J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant's request for partial annulment of the Commission's decision of 22 October 2008 regarding the introduction of a compensatory allowance in favour of officials who changed category before 1 May 2004, for reclassification, with retroactive effect from 1 May 2004, in grade D*4/8 and for reconstruction of his career to reflect the promotions, annual adjustments and advancements in step to which it had been subject since then.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Mr Van Asbroek shall bear all the costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 317, 20.11.2010, p. 50.