- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-474/23. Alfasoft: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — Alfasoft S.A. v Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici și Mijlocii, Atragere de Investiții și Promovare a Exportului Cluj-Napoca (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CB0474
62023CB0474
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/1514
26.2.2024
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/1514)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Alfasoft S.A.
Defendant: Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici și Mijlocii, Atragere de Investiții și Promovare a Exportului Cluj-Napoca
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Court of Appeal, Cluj, Romania), by decision of 3 July 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1514/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)