- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-684/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 November 2022 — S.Ö. v Stadt Duisburg
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0684
62022CN0684
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.1.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/30
(Case C-684/22)
(2023/C 24/39)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: S.Ö.
Defendant: Stadt Duisburg
Questions referred
1.Does Article 20 TFEU preclude a provision under which, in the case of voluntary acquisition of (non-privileged) nationality of a third country, nationality of the Member State and thus citizenship of the Union are lost ex lege where an individual examination of the consequences of the loss is conducted only if the foreign national concerned previously made an application for a retention permit and that application was approved prior to acquisition of the foreign nationality?
2.If the first question is to be answered in the negative: Is Article 20 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that, in the procedure for the grant of the retention permit, no conditions may be laid down as a result of which an individual assessment of the situation of the person concerned and that of his or her family with regard to the consequences of the loss of citizenship of the Union does not take place or is superseded by other requirements?