- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-159/16: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Metronia v EUIPO — Zitro IP (TRIPLE O NADA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark TRIPLE O NADA — Earlier EU figurative mark TRIPLE BINGO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0159
62016TA0159
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.7.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 213/29
(Case T-159/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark TRIPLE O NADA - Earlier EU figurative mark TRIPLE BINGO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 213/38)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Metronia, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2016 (Case R 2605/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Zitro IP and Metronia.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Metronia, SA to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.