I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Case T-1158/23)
(C/2024/1108)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: deluxe holding ApS (Kolding, Denmark) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Piffany Copenhagen ApS (Helsinge, Denmark)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: Community design No 7 745 252-0001 (Electric candles)
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 October 2023 in Case R 810/2022-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—in the alternative, remit the case to the Board of Appeal;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 6(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Incorrect statement of well-known facts;
—Infringement of Article 60(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.