- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-21/22: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2023 — NY v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Commission’s internal security investigation — Alleged acts of violence by the Commission’s security personnel — Prohibition of entry into buildings — Confiscation of service pass — Claim for compensation — Dismissal of the claim — Principle of good administration — Right to integrity and dignity — Error of assessment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0021
62022TA0021
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 179/38
(Case T-21/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Officials - Commission’s internal security investigation - Alleged acts of violence by the Commission’s security personnel - Prohibition of entry into buildings - Confiscation of service pass - Claim for compensation - Dismissal of the claim - Principle of good administration - Right to integrity and dignity - Error of assessment - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)
(2023/C 179/55)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: NY (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Lilamand and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 14 April 2021 by which the latter dismissed his claim for compensation and, where appropriate, of the decision of 4 October 2021 by which the latter rejected his complaint.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.