- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2008. # Powderject Research Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark POWDERMED - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. # Case T-166/06.
ECLI:EU:T:2008:408
62006TO0166
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-166/06)
Community trade mark – Application for the Community word mark POWDERMED – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 22-25)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 April 2006 (Case R 1189/2005‑2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign POWDERMED as a Community trade mark.
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark POWDERMED for goods and services in Classes 5, 10 and 42 – Application No 4202743
Decision of the Examiner:
Refusal of registration
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
Operative part
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Powderject Research Ltd to pay the costs.