EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-293/06: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 February 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg, Germany) — Deutsche Shell GmbH v Finanzamt für Großunternehmen in Hamburg (Freedom of establishment — Taxation of companies — Monetary effects upon the repatriation of start-up capital granted by a company established in one Member State to its permanent establishment in another Member State)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006CA0293

62006CA0293

January 1, 2006
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

26.4.2008

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/4

(Case C-293/06)(Freedom of establishment - Taxation of companies - Monetary effects upon the repatriation of start-up capital granted by a company established in one Member State to its permanent establishment in another Member State)

(2008/C 107/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Deutsche Shell GmbH

Defendant: Finanzamt für Großunternehmen in Hamburg

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of Articles 43 EC and 48 EC — Currency exchange loss incurred by a company established in one Member State at the time of repatriation of the start-up capital which it had granted to a permanent establishment set up in another Member State — Not possible to take that loss into account for purposes of taxation in the Member State in which the company is established

Operative part of the judgment

1)It is contrary to Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment Article 43 EC) in conjunction with Article 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC) for a Member State, when determining the national basis of assessment, to exclude a currency loss suffered by a company with a registered office in that State upon the repatriation of start-up capital granted to its permanent establishment in another Member State.

2)It is also contrary to Article 52 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 43 EC) in conjunction with Article 58 of the EC Treaty (now Article 48 EC) for a Member State to allow a currency loss to be deducted as operating expenditure in respect of an undertaking with a registered office in a Member State only in so far as its permanent establishment in another Member State does not make any tax-free profits.

(1) OJ C 237, 30.9.2006

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia