- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-229/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht (Germany), lodged on 24 June 2009 — Rechtsanwaltssozietät Lovells v Bayer CropScience AG
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CN0229
62009CN0229
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.9.2009
Official Journal of the European Union
C 220/19
(Case C-229/09)
2009/C 220/34
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Claimant: Rechtsanwaltssozietät Lovells
Defendant: Bayer CropScience AG
Question referred
For the purpose of the application of Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products, must account be taken exclusively of a marketing authorisation under Article 4 of Directive 91/414/EEC, or can a certificate also be issued pursuant to a marketing authorisation which has been granted on the basis of Article 8(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC?
Language of the case: German
* * *
(1) OJ 1996 L 198, p. 30.
(2) OJ 1991 L 230, p. 1.