I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Social security - Article 101(3) of the CEOS - Total and permanent invalidity - Refusal to recognise the invalidity as arising from an occupational disease - Obligation to state reasons - Medical assessments)
(C/2025/1764)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: DH (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 15 February 2023 stating that the invalidity from which she suffers is not of occupational origin and of the decision of 20 December 2023 rejecting the complaint that she filed against the contested decision.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders DH to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3178, 21.5.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1764/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—