I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-218/10)(1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark SERVICEPOINT - Earlier Community marks ServicePoint and earlier national marks - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 225/140
Language of the case: German
Applicant: DHL International (Bonn, Germany) (represented: initially by K.-U. Jonas and J. Bogatz, then M. Viefhues, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Service Point Solutions, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented: initially by E. Zamora Martinez, then C. Osterrieth, T. Schmitz and A. Doepner, and finally I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2012 (Case R 62/2009-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Service Point Solutions, SA and SHL Operations BV.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the application;
2.Orders DHL International GmbH to pay the costs.
OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.