I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Action for annulment - Dumping - Extension of anti-dumping duty imposed on the imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia - Independent importer - Article 263, fourth paragraph of TFEU - Lack of individual concern - Legislative measure containing implementing measure - Inadmissible)
2013/C 86/27
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Brugola Service International Srl (BSI) (Cassano Magnago, Italy) (represented by: S. Bariatti and M. Farneti, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and P. Mahnič Bruni, Agents, assisted initially by G. Berrisch and M. de Morpurgo, then by G. Berrisch, lawyers)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. França and D. Grespan, Agents)
Application for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 of 18 July 2011 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not (OJ 2011 L 194, p. 6).
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Brugola Service International Srl (BSI) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.
3.The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs.
(*1)
Language of the case: Italian.