- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-471/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 January 2021 — Federal Republic of Germany v Esso Raffinage, European Chemicals Agency, French Republic, Kingdom of the Netherlands (Appeal — Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) — Articles 5 and 6 — General obligation to register substances — Articles 41 and 42 — Evaluation of registration dossiers and compliance check of information submitted by registrants — Declaration of non-compliance — Actionable measure — Interest in bringing proceedings — Locus standi — Respective competences of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and national authorities — Obligation on ECHA to check the compliance of additional information submitted by registrants at its request — ECHA’s power to take an appropriate decision — Article 1 — Objective of protecting human health and the environment — Articles 13 and 25 — Use of animal testing — Promotion of alternative methods)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0471
62018CA0471
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 79/2
(Case C-471/18 P) (*)
(Appeal - Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) - Articles 5 and 6 - General obligation to register substances - Articles 41 and 42 - Evaluation of registration dossiers and compliance check of information submitted by registrants - Declaration of non-compliance - Actionable measure - Interest in bringing proceedings - Locus standi - Respective competences of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and national authorities - Obligation on ECHA to check the compliance of additional information submitted by registrants at its request - ECHA’s power to take an appropriate decision - Article 1 - Objective of protecting human health and the environment - Articles 13 and 25 - Use of animal testing - Promotion of alternative methods)
(2021/C 79/02)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by T. Henze and D. Klebs, and subsequently by D. Klebs and J. Möller, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Esso Raffinage (represented initially by H. Estreicher, Rechtsanwalt, and N. Navin-Jones, Solicitor, subsequently by H. Estreicher, Rechtsanwalt, A. Kołtunowska, adwokat, K. Merten-Lentz, avocate, and N. Navin-Jones, Solicitor, and finally by H. Estreicher, Rechtsanwalt, A. Kołtunowska, adwokat, and K. Merten-Lentz, avocate), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: W. Broere, C. Jacquet and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented initially by D. Colas, J. Traband and A.-L. Desjonquères, and subsequently by E. Leclerc, J. Traband, W. Zemamta and A.-L. Desjonquères, acting as Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: K. Bulterman and L. Noort, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of Esso Raffinage: European Coalition to End Animal Experiments (represented by: T. David, Solicitor), Higher Olefins and Poly Alpha Olefins REACH Consortium, Higher Olefins & Poly Alpha Olefins vzw (represented initially by E. Vermulst, advocaat, and subsequently by P. Kugel, advocaat)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Esso Raffinage and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA);
3.Orders the French Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the European Coalition to End Animal Experiments, Higher Olefins and Poly Alpha Olefins REACH Consortium and Higher Olefins & Poly Alpha Olefins vzw to bear their own costs.
* * *
(*) Language of the case: English.