- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-665/22: Action brought on 1 November 2022 — SkinIdent v EUIPO — Beiersdorf (NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0665
62022TN0665
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.12.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 472/49
(Case T-665/22)
(2022/C 472/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: SkinIdent AG (Freienbach, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Beiersdorf AG (Hamburg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark NIVEA SKIN-IDENTICAL Q10 — Application for registration No 18 041 739
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 August 2022 in Case R 1499/2021-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of 1 July 2021 in Case B 3 091 527;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.