I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2017/C 195/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Der Grüne Punkt — Duales System Deutschland GmbH (Cologne, Gemany) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, I. Rohr and N. Ebbecke, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Halston Properties, s. r. o. GmbH (Bratislava, Slovakia)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of a circle with two arrows) — EU trade mark No 298 273
Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 February 2017 in Case R 1357/2015-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs;
—in the event that the other party decides to intervene in the proceedings, order that intervener to bear its own costs.
—Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.