EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-40/24: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – IVDP v EUIPO – The Benriach Distillery Company (PORTSOY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY – Earlier PDO Port – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of use and evocation of a PDO)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0040

62024TA0040

February 26, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/2202

22.4.2025

(Case T-40/24)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY - Earlier PDO ‘Port’ - Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 - Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO)

(C/2025/2202)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) (Peso da Régua, Portugal) (represented by: P. Sousa e Silva, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: The Benriach Distillery Company Ltd (Edinburgh, United Kingdom)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 November 2023 (Case R 1885/2022-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1)

OJ C C/2024/1882, 11.3.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2202/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia