- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-441/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2017 — Tetra Pharm (1997) v EUIPO — Sebapharma (SeboCalm) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark SeboCalm — Earlier EU word mark — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0441
62016TA0441
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-441/16) (*1)
‘(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark SeboCalm — Earlier EU word mark — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)’
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Tetra Pharm (1997) Ltd (Tel Aviv, Israel) (represented by: A. Gorzkiewicz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Sebapharma GmbH & Co. KG (Boppard, Germany) (represented by: J. Wald and D. Koal, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO dated 19 May 2016 (Case R 852/2015-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Sebapharma and Tetra Pharm (1997).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action.
2.Orders Tetra Pharm (1997) Ltd to pay the costs.
*
(*1) OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.