EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-457/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 December 2023 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Amazon.com Inc., Amazon EU Sàrl, Ireland (Appeal — State aid — Article 107(1) TFEU — Tax ruling adopted by a Member State — Aid declared incompatible with the internal market — Concept of ‘advantage’ — Determination of the reference framework — ‘Normal’ taxation according to national law — Arm’s length principle — Review by the Court of Justice of interpretation and application of national law by the General Court)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0457

62021CA0457

December 14, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1066

(Case C-457/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Tax ruling adopted by a Member State - Aid declared incompatible with the internal market - Concept of ‘advantage’ - Determination of the reference framework - ‘Normal’ taxation according to national law - Arm’s length principle - Review by the Court of Justice of interpretation and application of national law by the General Court)

(C/2024/1066)

Languages of the case: English and French

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: F. Tomat and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented initially by A. Germeaux and T. Uri, and subsequently by A. Germeaux and T. Schell, acting as Agents, and by J. Bracker, A. Steichen and D. Waelbroeck, avocats), Amazon.com Inc., Amazon EU Sàrl; (represented by D. Paemen, M. Petite and A. Tombiński, avocats), Ireland (represented by A. Joyce, acting as Agent, and by P. Baker, KC, C. Donnelly, Senior Counsel, B. Doherty, Barrister-at-law, D. Fennelly, Barrister-at-law, and P. Gallagher, Senior Counsel)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders the European Commission to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Amazon.com Inc. and Amazon EU Sàrl;

3.Orders Ireland to bear its own costs.

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1066/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 452, 8.11.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia