- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-111/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta Domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 12 March 2008 — SCT Industri Aktiebolag i likvidation v Alpenblume Aktiebolag
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008CN0111
62008CN0111
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.5.2008
Official Journal of the European Union
C 116/16
(Case C-111/08)
(2008/C 116/28)
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: SCT Industri Aktiebolag i likvidation
Defendant: Alpenblume Aktiebolag
Question referred
Is the exception in the Brussels I Regulation regarding insolvency, compositions and analogous proceedings to be interpreted as meaning that it covers a decision given by a court in one Member State (A) regarding registration of ownership of shares in a company having its registered office in Member State A, which ownership is transferred by the liquidator to a company in another Member State (B), where the court based its decision on the fact that Member State A, in the absence of an agreement between the States regarding mutual recognition of insolvency proceedings, does not recognise the liquidator's powers of disposal over property in Member State A?