- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-496/15 P: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2016 — CX v Commission (Appeal — Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Downgrading — Rights of the defence — Articles 4 and 6 of the Staff Regulations — Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Principle of proportionality — Manifest error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0496
62015TA0496
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.6.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 232/20
(Case T-496/15 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Appeal - Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary measure - Downgrading - Rights of the defence - Articles 4 and 6 of the Staff Regulations - Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Principle of proportionality - Manifest error of assessment))
(2016/C 232/26)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: CX (Enghien, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015, CX v Commission (F-27/13, EU:F:2015:60), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders CX to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.