- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-123/23, Khan Yunis: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden (Germany) lodged on 1 March 2023 — N. A. K., E. A. K., Y. A. K v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0123
62023CN0123
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.7.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 261/2
(Case C-123/23, Khan Yunis (*) )
(2023/C 261/04)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: N. A. K., E. A. K., Y. A. K.
Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Question referred
Must Article 33(2)(d) of Directive 2013/32/EU, read in conjunction with Article 2(q) of that directive, be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which an application for international protection lodged in that Member State is to be rejected as inadmissible if an application for international protection previously lodged in another Member State has been finally rejected by that other Member State as unfounded?
(*) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
(*) Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast) (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).