- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-40/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 November 2013 — Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH, formerly Sachsa Verpackung GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Cartels — Industrial plastic bags sector — Whether the infringement by a subsidiary may be attributed to the parent company — Excessive length of the proceedings before the General Court — Principle of effective legal protection)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CA0040
62012CA0040
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.2.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 39/2
(Case C-40/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Competition - Cartels - Industrial plastic bags sector - Whether the infringement by a subsidiary may be attributed to the parent company - Excessive length of the proceedings before the General Court - Principle of effective legal protection)
2014/C 39/02
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH, formerly Sachsa Verpackung GmbH (represented by: F. Puel and L. François-Martin, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and N. von Lingen, Agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 November 2011 in Case T-79/06 Sachsa Verpackung v Commission, by which that court dismissed the application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 (EC) (Case COMP/38.354 — Industrial bags) concerning a cartel in the industrial plastic bags sector and an application to vary that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH to pay the costs of this appeal.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.