EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-431/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2019 — WN v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Early termination of the contract — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Rights of defence — Conciliation procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Discrimination on grounds of sex — Maternity leave — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0431

62018TA0431

November 7, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13.1.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/31

(Case T-431/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)

(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Early termination of the contract - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Rights of defence - Conciliation procedure - Manifest error of assessment - Discrimination on grounds of sex - Maternity leave - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials)

(2020/C 10/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: WN (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Í. Ní Riagáin Düro and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 28 September 2017 to terminate the applicant’s contract as an accredited parliamentary assistant and, secondly, compensation for the non-material damage she allegedly suffered as a result of the Parliament’s conduct.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 319, 10.9.2018.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia