- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-774/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem v EUIPO — Užstato sistemos administratorius (Representation of a bottle and an arrow) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bottle and an arrow — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a can, a bottle and an arrow — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0774
62021TA0774
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/520
(Case T-774/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bottle and an arrow - Earlier EU figurative mark representing a can, a bottle and an arrow - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2023/520)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: J. Götz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and A. Ringelhann, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Užstato sistemos administratorius VšĮ (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by Ą. Čekanavičius, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 September 2021 (Case R 117/2020-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem GmbH to pay the costs.
*
(*) Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/520/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)