- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-216/11: Action brought on 18 April 2011 — Progust v OHIM — Sopralex & Vosmarques (IMPERIA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0216
62011TN0216
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 194/15
(Case T-216/11)
2011/C 194/24
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Progust, SL (Girona, Spain) (represented by: M. E. López Camba and J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sopralex & Vosmarques SA (Brussels, Belgium)
Form of order sought
The applicant requests the Court to:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal in Case R 1036/2010-1 in its entirety;
—order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by Progust, SL;
—order Sopralex & Vosmarques SA to pay the costs incurred by Progust, SL.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Progust, SL.
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘IMPERIA’ (application for registration No 7.008.154), for goods and services in Classes 29, 30, 31, 32 and 43.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Sopralex & Vosmarques SA.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative mark (No 3.260.288), containing the word element ‘IMPERIAL’ for goods in Class 29.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld and application for registration refused.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.
Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009