EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-143/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2023 — OP v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Survivor’s pension — Refusal to grant — Surviving spouse — Eligibility conditions — Duration of the marriage — Plea of illegality — Article 80, first paragraph, of the Staff Regulations — Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Orphans’ pension — Refusal to grant — Concept of ‘dependent child’ — Error of law)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0143

62022TA0143

June 7, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

17.7.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/45

(Case T-143/22) (*)

(Civil service - Officials - Survivor’s pension - Refusal to grant - Surviving spouse - Eligibility conditions - Duration of the marriage - Plea of illegality - Article 80, first paragraph, of the Staff Regulations - Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Orphans’ pension - Refusal to grant - Concept of ‘dependent child’ - Error of law)

(2023/C 252/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: OP (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Van Pottelberge and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Alver, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 7 June 2021, in so far as it rejects her application for a survivor’s pension on account of the death of her husband, a former official of the Parliament and, on behalf of her son A, annulment of that decision in so far as it rejects her application for an orphans’ pension for their son who has a disability.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 7 June 2021 in so far as it refuses to grant A an orphans’ pension;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders the Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by OP;

4.Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

*

(*) Language of the case: French.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia