29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/8

(Case C-518/18)

(2018/C 392/12)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RD

Defendant: SC

Question referred

Must Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims be interpreted as meaning that a claim which has been decided on after taking evidence may be regarded as uncontested if neither the defendant, who acknowledged the debt before the commencement of the action, nor the guardian took part in the court proceedings, and they did not raise any objections in the course of the proceedings?

(1) OJ 2004 L 143, p. 15.

* * *