- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-419/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 July 2009 — Okalux v OHIM — Messe Düsseldorf (OKATECH) (Community trade mark — Forfeiture proceedings — Community word mark OKATECH — Partial revocation — Period allowed for appeal — Articles 57 and 77a of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 58 and 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Principles of protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty — Right to a hearing)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TA0419
62007TA0419
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.8.2009
Official Journal of the European Union
C 193/20
(Case T-419/07)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Forfeiture proceedings - Community word mark OKATECH - Partial revocation - Period allowed for appeal - Articles 57 and 77a of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 58 and 80 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Principles of protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty - Right to a hearing)
2009/C 193/29
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Okalux GmbH (Marktheidenfeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Beckensträter, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Messe Düsseldorf GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented initially by: I Friedhoff, and subsequently by: S. von Petersdorff-Campen, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2007 (Case R 766/2007-2) concerning forfeiture proceedings between Messe Düsseldorf GmbH and Okalux GmbH.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Okalux GmbH to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 8, 12.1.2008.