I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
European Court reports 2001 Page I-09835
3. In this case it is clear from the documents before the Court that, at the end of the period of two months fixed by the reasoned opinion, that is 5 October 1999, the Hellenic Republic had not adopted the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directives 97/41, 98/51 and 98/67. The Greek Government does not dispute those facts, even though it seeks the dismissal of the action.
Therefore, I suggest that the Court should uphold the Commission's action and declare that:
(1) By failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directives:
- 97/41/EC of the Council of 25 June 1997 amending Directives 76/895/EEC, 86/362/EEC, 86/363/EEC and 90/642/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on, respectively, fruit and vegetables, cereals, foodstuffs of animal origin and certain products of plant origin, including fruit and vegetables,
- 98/51/EC of the Commission of 9 July 1998 laying down certain measures for implementing Council Directive 95/69/EC laying down the conditions and arrangements for approving and registering certain establishments and intermediaries operating in the animal feed sector, and
- 98/67/EC of the Commission of 7 September 1998 amending Directives 80/511/EEC, 82/475/EEC, 91/357/EEC and Council Directive 96/25/EC and repealing Directive 92/87/EEC,
the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of Directive 97/41, Article 10(1) of Directive 98/51 and Article 7(1) of Directive 98/67.
(2) The Hellenic Republic is ordered to pay the costs.