EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-381/21: Order of the General Court of 22 December 2021 — D&A Pharma v EMA (Action for annulment — Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus — Non-renewal of a permanent scientific advisory group — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0381

62021TB0381

December 22, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.3.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/46

(Case T-381/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Hopveus - Non-renewal of a permanent scientific advisory group - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

(2022/C 119/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Debregeas et associés Pharma (D&A Pharma) (Paris, France) (represented by: N. Viguié and D. Krzisch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: C. Bortoluzzi, H. Kerr, S. Marino and S. Drosos, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of EMA not to renew the scientific advisory group on psychiatry within the Committee for Human Medicinal Products, revealed implicitly by the public call for expression of interest for experts to become members of EMA’s scientific advisory groups and the press release of EMA of 5 May 2021.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the European Parliament.

3.Debregeas et associés Pharma (D & A Pharma) shall pay the costs.

4.The Parliament shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 329, 16.8.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia