I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2018/C 032/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Mouldpro ApS (Ballerup, Denmark) (represented by: W Rebernik, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG (Lüdenscheid, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MOULDPRO’ — EU trade mark No 10 022 317
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 October 2017 in Case R 2153/2015-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
—Unlawful registration by an agent or representative, CTMR article 51(1)(b), in conjunction with article 8(3);
—Earlier non registered trademark rights used in the course of trade CTMR article 53(1)(c), in conjunction with article 8(4);
—The EUTM was applied in bad faith by the proprietor CMTR article 52(1)(b).