I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-434/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark CENTROTHERM - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Admissibility of new evidence - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Plea of illegality - Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
2011/C 311/78
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH (Brilon, Germany) (represented by: J. Albrecht and U. Vormbrock, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and R. Manea, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG (Blaubeuren, Germany) (represented by: O. Löffel, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 August 2009 (Case R 6/2008-4) relating to revocation proceedings between centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG and Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Centrotherm Systemtechnik GmbH to pay the costs;
3.Orders centrotherm Clean Solutions GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.