I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-146/16) (*)
(State aid - Annulment of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 62/37)
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicants: Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland (‘s-Graveland, Netherlands) and the 12 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: P. Kuypers and M. de Wit, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal and S. Noë, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicants: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman, J. Langer and M. Noort, acting as Agents)
Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 5929 final of 2 September 2015 on State aid SA.27301 (2015/NN) — Netherlands, relating to the subsidised acquisition or free granting of nature land, a summary of which has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2016 C 9, p. 1).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene lodged by Vereniging Gelijkberechtiging Grondbezitters and the other applicants for leave to intervene whose names are set out in Annex II.
3.Each party shall bear its own costs.
4.Vereniging Gelijkberechtiging Grondbezitters and the other applicants for leave to intervene whose names are set out in Annex II shall bear the costs relating to their application to intervene.
(*)
Language of the case: Dutch