I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case F-130/12)( (<span class="super">1</span>) )
((Civil Service - Remuneration - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Double dependent child allowance - Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations - Conditions for grant - Amicable settlement between the parties after the intervention of the European Ombudsman - Implementation - Duty of care))
2014/C 223/68
Language of the case: French
Applicant: CI (represented by: B. Cortese and A. Salerno, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Despotopoulou and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)
Application to annul the decision refusing to grant the double dependant child allowance under Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 5 December 2011 refusing to renew, with effect from 1 June 2008, the double dependent child allowance, and the decision of 20 July 2012 rejecting the claim;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the action;
3.Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CI.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2014223EN.01006602-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2014223EN.01006602-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 71, 9.3.2013, p. 29.