EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-950/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by A (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Company law — Directive 2006/43/EC — Statutory audit of annual and consolidated accounts — Article 22a(1)(a) — Recruitment of a statutory auditor by an audited entity — Waiting period — Prohibition on taking up a key management post in the audited entity — Infringement — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Expression ‘taking up a post’ — Scope — Conclusion of an employment contract with the audited entity — Independence of statutory auditors — External appearance)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0950

62019CA0950

March 24, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

17.5.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/4

(Case C-950/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Company law - Directive 2006/43/EC - Statutory audit of annual and consolidated accounts - Article 22a(1)(a) - Recruitment of a statutory auditor by an audited entity - Waiting period - Prohibition on taking up a key management post in the audited entity - Infringement - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Expression ‘taking up a post’ - Scope - Conclusion of an employment contract with the audited entity - Independence of statutory auditors - External appearance)

(2021/C 189/04)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Intervening party: Patentti- ja rekisterihallituksen tilintarkastuslautakunta

Operative part of the judgment

Article 22a(1)(a) of Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC, as amended by Directive 2014/56/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 must be interpreted as meaning that a statutory auditor, such as a key audit partner, appointed by an audit firm in the context of a statutory audit engagement, must be regarded as holding a key management position in an audited entity, within the meaning of that provision, as soon as he or she concludes an employment contract with the latter relating to that post, even if he or she has not yet begun to actually perform his or her duties in that post.

* Language of the case: Finnish.

ECLI:EU:C:2021:140

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia