I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark Bebimil - Earlier Community and national word marks BLEMIL - Earlier national word mark BLEMIL 1 - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Likelihood of confusion)
2009/C 267/92
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Hipp & Co KG (Sachseln, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Latinien and A. Folliard-Mongiural, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Laboratoris Ordesa, SL (Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: R. Thierie and E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 June 2006 (Case R 571/2005-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Ordesa, SL and Hipp & Co. KG.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.orders Hipp & Co. KG to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 237, 30.9.2006.