I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
21.10.2024
(Case T-568/23)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark MiT FREUDE NASCHEN! - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2024/6098)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: August Storck KG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 July 2023 (Case R 539/2023-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
—
OJ C C/2023/231, 23.10.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6098/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
—