- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-479/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0479
62016TN0479
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.10.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 383/22
(Case T-479/16)
(2016/C 383/31)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler, A. Stolz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘AROMASENSATIONS’ — Application for registration No 14 198 824
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 in Case R 2482/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision to the extent that it dismisses the appeal insofar as it is based on Article 7(1)(b);
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of principles of equal treatment and sound administration.